Student Center at Northwestern University
Ethnographic Research // User Contextual Interviews // Personas // Lenses // Ideation // Storyboarding // Business Case
To solve a problem, you need to make sure it’s real and you need to tell a story.
As part of the mpd2 program at Northwestern University, my team was tasked with a problem: How might Norris provide a better experience for users?
Through research, analysis, creative problem solving, and visualization we tackled the problem over a month.
The Student Center is often called Norris after the student from which it is named.
Using A-E-I-O-U
To begin understanding the Student Center at Northwestern, our team employed a simple framework to gather and organize information using the vowels A, E, I, O & U.
Activities - What will we see people doing? What are the modes people work in and the specific activities and processes that people go through?
Environments - Where will we go to observe behaviors? What is the character and function of the space overall, and of individuals spaces or shared spaces?
Interactions - Who/what are the interactions we’ll observe? What is the nature of routine and special interactions between people, between people and objects in their environment, or across distances?
Objects - What things are people using? What are the objects and devices people have in their environments and how do they relate to their activities?
Users - Who will we observe? What are the roles and relationships? What are the values and perceptions?
Primary Research Time
Getting to know the users and people of the Student Center
After putting a framework to the initial basic research phase in the findings of the Student Center, our job was to further our research through personal immersion, user self-documentation, more observation, and contextual interviews.
Our team found observation and personal immersion to be our most useful methods of research. Contextual interviews and user self-documentation were impossible however because the Student Center administration required that we have permission to even speak to people for research.
Analysis Paralysis
Getting through the research means also seeing the data through lenses, synthesizing it and ideating from it.
We thought that research would be the most difficult part of this project.
We were wrong.
I am not sure we could put a number of hours on the work that we put in to analyzing the data, but it definitely took weeks (at least I think).
Through the use of Lenses like Values, Activities, and Modes of Behavior, we were able to categorize facts from our research. Then we turned those into Insights that were interesting, relevant, and actionable.
From our three insights, we developed “How Might We” sentences that reopened the funnel of the process that leads to ideation and creation.
The idea that our team found would address the problem the best was a bar called “Wild House” located in Norris that would improve the student experience by making it a place students could grow within their undergraduate careers.
Charlie's Journey
Making the case.
Once we had a solution, the final piece was to make it concrete. This entailed making a business case for why the Wild House would be a successful solution and why it would improve the student experience at Norris.